Regarding frost v knight..it is a good law..why would they wanna repeal this?
it just doesnt make sense..it shows how important when we make a promise..
if knight broke off the engagement because love is fading..then in the first place dont commit himself..though he was sued for anticipatory breach..
promises are meant to be kept..know its harsh..but that should be the way..
knight has given hopeless hope to frost..
she might suffer from emotional scar..pity
why wanna give her hope when in the first place doesnt even exist..
well,maybe the courts find it difficult to enforce..maybe la..
whether he still loves her is another issue..
excuse of a frustration event(third party) is not acceptable..
just an opinion after all..i'm not the judge..plus this case was long long time ago..
the fact that he promised,he is under an obligation to carry out..
1 comment:
LOL siah you still can't get over this case ar? =P haha
Post a Comment